RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The closest I could find was:

"Working groups SHOULD ensure that their associated mailing list is
 manageable.  For example, some may try to circumvent the revocation
 of their posting rights by changing email addresses; accordingly it
 should be possible to restrict the new email address."

from page 5 of RFC 3683.  Misrepresented identities may fall under the 
same banner as changing email addresses for the purposes of RFC 3683.

- Wes Beebee

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Russ Housley
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2008 11:36 AM
To: Christian Huitema
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Ltru] Possible RFC 3683 PR-action

I cannot find one.  It seem to be a hole than needs filled.

Russ


At 11:45 AM 3/23/2008, Christian Huitema wrote:
>Does the IETF have a policy regarding misrepresented identities?
>
>In the particular incident, it is assumed that the person using the 
>name of a famous French aviation pioneer is in fact someone else. On 
>the one hand, using pseudonyms is a form of free speech. But on the 
>other hand, in a standard setting body, hiding identities is not 
>necessarily something we want to encourage. What are the implications 
>for our standard process? What about copyrights and patents?
>
>-- Christian Huitema

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]