Hi Sam, --On March 18, 2008 4:51:42 AM -0400 Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > This extension appears to conflate two unrelated things: information > about the interpreter context and information about the message. > > I don't think these two sets of information are similar enough that the > same interface should be used to get to both of them. > > In particular I believe that the remote-host and remote-ip variables > are inappropriate and should not be standardized. > > I believe an applicability statement should be added to the extension > making it clear that this extension is only for interpreter state and > that another extension should be designed for examining information > about the message. > I am confused as to which items you think relate to a message as opposed to the interpreter state. This extension is supposed to be all about interpreter state - tests against messages are handled in the SIEVE base and the other extensions. -- Cyrus Daboo _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf