Sam Hartman wrote: >In conclusion, I object quite strongly combining message and >interpreter context information. The other comments I'm making are >less serous. However based on the number of comments I think this >document needs significant positive review before it is ready to be >published. > > Speaking as the document shepherd: the document received a fair number of reviews on the Sieve WG mailing list and there is support to progress it. Some comments raised would require a new revision before the document goes to IESG review. I will make sure that your comments are either addressed or answered+argued against by the author of the document. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf