Alexey Melnikov wrote: > The IESG wrote: > >> The file can be obtained via >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04.txt >> > > I've reviewed this document and support its publication. Based on some hallway discussions in Philadelphia, I suggest that the following RFC editor note be kept (after some rephrasing) in the document upon publication: NOTE: This table is incomplete. The entries denoted "Not given" should be filled in better. (RFC EDITOR NOTE: Remove this note on publication.) The reason for keeping the note is to make sure that the table doesn't list all allowed SMTP response codes. Without such note there is a risk that server implementors will think that no other SMTP response code is allowed for a particular enhanced status code. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf