--On Sunday, March 09, 2008 22:45:33 -0400 Ted Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> This particular ION had a life as an internet-draft with an intent to
> publish it as an RFC before the ION series existed. It was draft-iesg at
> one time, and no one came up with a draft-ietfer- counter proposal. But
> our mechanisms for allowing that kind of publication have years of
> experience behind them. Not so much for community commentary
> on IONs, IESG statements, or the like, which have tended to be perceived
> as changeable only by replacing the sitting IESG.
my memory says that "discuss criteria" started out as an I-D, but with no
consensus (or even a clear idea) on how to get a referenceable publication
of it. It was one of the exampels that made me suggest IONs, exactly for
that reason - RFC just didn't seem to fit.
Harald
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf