Harald, I'm lost, what BOF are you talking about? Cullen On Mar 4, 2008, at 6:19 AM, Harald Alvestrand wrote: > Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 04:32:08PM +0200, >> Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote >> a message of 21 lines which said: >> >> >>> But it is quite common when we revise a specification that we have >>> only an incomplete defect list. Or we may not have determined if a >>> particular issue is really a defect. Understanding which specific >>> issues have to be fixed is typically WG work in a bis spec effort. >>> >> >> But it is not in the charter, quite the contrary. The proposed >> charter >> is written as if there was a consensus on the IDN problems (there is >> not, besides the limitation to Unicode 3.2 and may be the bidi). No >> work is planned to discuss the problems, only solutions are present >> in >> the charter, already decided even before the WG exists. >> > The charter is an agenda item at the BOF. > If there's consensus that you're right and the proponents are wrong, > we > can change it. > > Harald > > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf