Tom.Petch wrote: >> Hm, we are talking about XML namespace names, not DTD URIs. >> >> XML processors are not supposed to resolve them, so it seems strange to >> insert requirements for clients that do so. >> > Welcome as this is, why is this I-D limited to XML namespace names? What about > XML Schema names? Pardon my ignorance, but what is an XML Schema name? I > And is this not an update to RFC3688? I'd consider it an alternative approach. BR, Julian _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf