On 3 mar 2008, at 14.38, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> Hold on. Is the WG really supposed to work on "perceived" defects?
> Either these defects are real or they are not. If they are not real,
> for instance, if they are FUD (this is quite common in the IDN arena),
> they should *not* be addressed by the WG.
I do not agree. I think it is important that the FUD (as you describe
it) is described as being FUD somewhere, and not just by silence
"ignored" by the IETF. We are trying to in the documents address all
different kind of issues and explain them. See RFC 4690, which in
reality is bootstrap for the work that is done.
Patrik
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf