The IESG wrote: > <draft-klensin-rfc2821bis-08.txt> as a Draft Standard In section 4.1.3 <dcontent> is undefined, fix proposed in <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.smtp/6622> <Standardized-tag> got no valid syntax, proposed fixes in the same article. For an <IPv6-addr> importing or adapting <IPv6address> from STD 66 would be clearer: The STD 66 syntax works as is, without any additional restrictions in comments. In section 4.2 <text> is undefined, it is unrelated to the <text> in 2822upd. Proposed fix, add a definition: text = 1*(%d32-126) In section 4.2.2 (reply codes by function group) 251 and 551 should form one group. STD 10 has a simple working philosophy about 251+551, unfortunately broken by STD 3. In section 4.1.2 <Keyword> and <Argument> are apparently unused and can be removed. For the collected syntax see <http://hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz.googlepages.com/2821bis.ABNF.1> The ehlo-greet = 1*(%d0-9 / %d11-12 / %d14-127) allows NUL and obs-NO-WS-CTL, maybe this is a fair warning for SMTP clients that servers can be peculiar. On the SMTP list Mark E. Mallet yesterday (too late for 2821bis-08) proposed a few clarifications. About four of his points could be errata if they'd make it in 2821bis. Frank _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf