Tom.Petch wrote: > I think that there have been rather more problems in areas that are less in the > public view, supporting the more private parts of the operation. This community has been moving relentlessly towards a complete loss of any sense of propriety. So I guess it was inevitable that we would have to suffer through references to the IETF's private parts. I cringe at the possible application of that discussion framework to the details of IETF anatomy and performance. The latter, in particular, engenders much anxiety. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf