ISP support models Re: IPv6 NAT?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Feb 19, 2008, at 9:11 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

On 19 feb 2008, at 14:20, John C Klensin wrote:

(1) With NATs, every SOHO network (or at least every SOHO
network an ISP can claim with a straight face to support) has
exactly the same topology and addressing architecture.

Is this important? The external address(es) are still different.

Sure, but the home internal networks are identical.  So Homeowner A calls up the ISP support and is having a problem getting a machine to work with the wireless router provided by the ISP.  So the ISP tech says "on a working machine, point your browser to 192.168.10.1 and...."

A while later Homeowner B calls in with a similar problem. The ISP tech says "on a working machine, point your browser to 192.168.10.1 and..."  Same with Homeowners C, D, E and so on.

The variables are reduced to the smallest number so that the tech support issues can be reduced to as few as possible. The responses to those issues can then be scripted so that call center folks with minimal knowledge of the subject can assist (or the entire support operation can be outsourced to some remote call center).

So for those ISPs that do this, using NAT to have identical home networks is a beautiful thing.  Keeps their costs low and hopefully their customer satisfaction high.  (Of course, probably exactly *none* of those of us on this list have such an ISP since we all like to mess with our own networks.)

Dan

-- 
Dan York, CISSP, Director of Emerging Communication Technology
Office of the CTO    Voxeo Corporation     dyork@xxxxxxxxx
Phone: +1-407-455-5859  Skype: danyork  http://www.voxeo.com

Bring your web applications to the phone.




_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]