On 2008-2-15, at 16:21, ext Bernard Aboba wrote: > However, I would suspect that clearly specifying how SCTP and DCCP > work with NAT would eventually make it possible to obtain a home NAT > supporting those protocols, particularly if implementations were made > available within the popular distributions (e.g. DD-WRT) on which > those > home NATs are frequently based. Completely agree. And as a coincidence, earlier today a Linux developer posted this on the DCCP mailing list: On 2008-2-14, at 21:18, ext Ian McDonald wrote: > As regards to work underway there is an implementation in the Linux > kernel to provide NAT/connection tracking for DCCP and it is believed > to work well - basically does the same as UDP/TCP. This has been in > the Linux kernel for sometime now, so may be of some use for this > work. But note that this isn't - yet - based on any IETF spec. But the author of the likely BEHAVE work item on this and the implementors of the Linux code are chatting, I believe. Lars _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf