RFC Editor costs - Proofreading (was Re: My view of the IAOC Meeting Selection Guidelines)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Fred Baker wrote:
  > We're looking pretty hard at the RFC Editor contract, which has a
> large overhead fee built into it. Stay tuned in that regard. We have  
> some ideas and will be doing an RFI or RFP later this year, but they  
> aren't sufficiently baked just yet to pass aromas around.


What follows is a topic that too-easily invites injudicious comment, so I'll 
preface by saying that I'm posting this publicly only as a means of soliciting 
public comment on one particular cost:  RFC draft proofreading.

After some years of hiatus, I again started working with the RFC Editor on the 
details of publishing some documents.  So I was surprised to experience the kind 
offices of professional proofreading.

My own assessment is that it has improved the documents. The proofreaders have 
their own views of what is correct and that sometimes requires discussion, but 
mostly I consider their intervention to have a positive impact.

The question to me -- and which I am posing to everyone else -- is whether the 
improvement is worth the cost?

Professional proofreading is not cheap.

While we can easily cite the dangers of badly written specifications, I'll also 
note that we got along for a couple of decades without this extra service. IETF 
documents that get to the editor have gone through extensive reviewing. We can, 
I think easily rely on that fact, since we successfuly did so for 25+ years.

I'll also suggest that any strategic problems that a specification might suffer 
cannot be fixed with professional proofreading.

Thoughts?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]