Re: I-D submission tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> However, we have to keep a sense of proportion. Having been one of  
> the pre-transition testers (although not of this particular tool),  
> I've seen enough to know that the AMS folk have been investing  
> tremendous effort to find and quickly fix problems. They deserve  
> thanks and understanding, which is not to say that bugs shouldn't  
> be fixed ASAP.

violent agreement. They're working double shifts, and experiencing  
problems of a nature that helps justify the decision to transition.


Folks, let me discard the kimono for a moment and ask for  
forbearance. The comments in this thread so far have been to the  
mark, but the IETF list and the mumble-attendees lists are well known  
for people saying some pretty unnecessary things. In this case, the  
NSS secretariat managed to not communicate to the AMS secretariat  
basic things like "we run rsync", and configuration files that the  
NSS secretariat used that lived in someone's home directory without  
CVS-or-whatever control and were deleted as private because of what  
directory they were in. The fact that the transition has gone as  
smoothly as it has - and it has in fact gone very well for the most  
part - reflects a very high level of professionalism at AMS and a  
huge amount of hard work on the part of a small and very dedicated  
team, and a high level of cooperation between the AMS engineers and  
the tools team.

If you have issues that need to be addressed, please send email to  
ietf-action@xxxxxxxxx The trouble ticket system is working.
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]