Re: IPv6 addresses really are scarce after all - /64 FIB burden oops...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I retract what I wrote in a previous message about DFZ routers
needing to look at 64 bits of the packet's destination address.

I misunderstood the text:

> LIR's may assign blocks in the range of /48 to /64 to end sites.
> All assignments made by LIR's should meet a minimum HD-Ratio of
> .25.
>
> * /64 - Site needing only a single subnet.
> * /60 - Site with 2-3 subnets initially.
> * /56 - Site with 4-7 subnets initially.
> * /52 - Site with 8-15 subnets initially.
> * /48 - Site with 16+ subnets initially.

from:

  http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/ppml/2007-August/008521.html

as referring to RIRs.

This proposal doesn't lead to any greater burden on FIBs of DFZ
routers, but I still think the /48 PI end-user assignments are
pretty hard on the routers.

Each VoIP call between hosts in two /48 prefixes with 16 DFZ routers
en-route involves those routers collectively working through this
many bits:

  50 * 2 * 48 * 16 = 76,800 bits!

  - Robin


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]