> this is silly. any site with even a single IPv4 address can > get a /48 through 6to4, and this was chosen to match the > architected minimum allocation for a native prefix. > > someone should tell ARIN that trying to mess with the address > architecture is out of their scope. And that someone is the IETF because the IETF is the someone who created the architecture in the first place. It would not be out of place for some of the indivduals who were at the center of creating this architecture to produce an informational RFC with guidance to RIRs. Since all the RIRs have relatively open policymaking processes, it is relatively easy for people drenched in IPv4 thinking to water down the IPv6 addressing architecture. If someone out there can point me to an RFC reference for the IPv6 address architecture, I will pass it on. --Michael Dillon _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf