On Aug 8, 2007, at 4:22 PM, David Conrad wrote:
Hi,
On Aug 8, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Which widespread IPv4 stacks?
I think it might be easier to identify stacks that don't disallow
240/4. I don't actually know of any widespread ones.
I had a specific idea for 240 and asked around and didn't find any
either. So, this means a year or two to
develop and deploy at best, and probably a fork-lift upgrade at that,
which does not seem that attractive.
If someone came out with a specific idea backed by hardware, though,
is there a reason not to let
them go forward ?
Regards
Marshall
Rather than wall off the space as private and thus put it beyond
any use we should think about what other uses we might be putting
it to.
Calling address space private obviously does not "put it beyond any
use". In fact, there are folks out there who are burning public IP
address space for internal infrastructure that could instead be
using private space but can't because their internal
infrastructures are too large.
Regards,
-drc
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf