Re: Last Call: draft-hutzler-spamops (Email Submission: Access and Accountability) to BCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





John C Klensin wrote:
--On Saturday, June 09, 2007 20:00 +0000 John Levine <johnl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Side note: on Unix, will cron be forced to authenticate to
send emails at 2 am? :-)

Perhaps a sentence or two clarifying that this only applies to
SMTP and SUBMIT would be in order

But there are a large number of SOHO and consumer boxes, designed for use as firewalls, etc., which are capable of sending out mail via SMTP containing their logs. They are not multi-user, are presumably difficult to compromise by virus or worm, and are typically configured only to send mail to SMTP servers they protect and hence presumably trust. Given the prohibitions in this document, where are those devices left? Am I correct in assuming that this document would intend to prohibit those devices as non-conforming?

No.

If the devices (or cron, or whatever) are indeed sending valid mail by virtue of having been configured properly and not having been compromised, then it sounds to me as if the mail is very much authentic (and authenticated.)

d/

--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]