On 2007-05-23 14:19, Jeroen Massar wrote: ...
Alternatively, directly look up http://www1.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/cisco-ipr-draft-claise-ipfix-export-per-sctp-stream-00.txt
(The above long formatted lines are not mine, 72 is a nice limit FYI) Sorry to be blunt, but what exactly is the point again of 'opening up NetFlow' if there is going to be IPR stuff being smacked upon IPFIX and thus encumbering it?
It's a defensive non-assert disclosure, which IMHO is equivalent to RF for anyone who plays nicely. Actually a defensive non-assert may indirectly *protect* a normal implementor, when you think about its impact on a third party implementor who does try to assert a patent. Brian (IMHO, YMMV, etc.) _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf