Re: [ietf-dkim] Re: Use of LWSP in ABNF -- consensus call

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On May 17, 2007, at 2:27 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

I think you are assuming a more constrained discussion than what I've been seeing on this thread. The thread has discussed everything from removing the rule, to redefining it, to declaring it "deprecated", to adding some commentary text.

I think that only the later was suggested. Declaring the macro "deprecated" would not remove the definition or redefine it. Any additional comments should simply indicate this construct should be used with caution and defined locally with a different mnemonic. On the bright side, this does not impact the ABNF definition.

-Doug


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]