Good question.
But that isn't how the survey question was phrased.
The question wasn't "should IETF provide breakfast (in general)?"
The question was "should IETF skip breakfast if the contract hotel provides it?", which seems to presume that IETF WILL continue to provide (continental) breakfast if it is not included in the room rate at the contract hotel.
Janet
Dave Crocker <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 04/19/2007 07:25:33 AM:
>
>
> Janet P Gunn wrote:
> > But if it is ONLY the "contracted hotel" that provides breakfast, and
> > the other hotels do not, then I think that the meeting should provide at
> > least SOME breakfast items.
>
> Whether a break period should or should not include food might be a
> reasonable question, given the limited time to forage for food elsewhere.
>
> But what is the reason for presuming that the IETF has an obligation to
> feed us meals? Why breakfast, but no other meal? Why any?
>
> d/
>
> --
>
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf