Hi - > From: "Tom.Petch" <sisyphus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "ietf" <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:43 AM > Subject: Re: Last Call: draft-williams-on-channel-binding (On the Use ofChannel Bindings to Secure Channels) to Proposed Standard ... > Otherwise those who would benefit from it - isms, netconf, syslog, ... ? - will > not understand what they might do. I appreciate that something of this ilk has > been around for a while (eg as when Ira McDonald pointed the isms list at > draft-puthenkulam-eap-binding-04.txt) but I think that it got no traction > because of its impenetrability. ... In the isms WG, we were told that we could not use EAP. http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/isms/current/msg00464.html Randy _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf