RE: In support of symbolic references

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 9:13 AM
> To: Simon Josefsson
> Cc: Sam Hartman; ietf@xxxxxxxx; Steven M. Bellovin
> Subject: Re: In support of symbolic references
> 
> Simon,
> 
> > Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
> +1
> 
> (I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with 
> John Klensin's concern.)
> 
> Jari
> 

Same here. 

I used symbolic references in all documents I authored or co-authored
recently and I have expressed my preference for symbolic references in
many reviews I performed in the past, although I was missing grounds to
make this a very strong recommendation.

Dan

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]