Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2007-04-06 08:12, Jari Arkko wrote:
Simon,
Maybe we can lobby for it to become the default.
+1
(I think it would be the right default, even if I agree with John
Klensin's concern.)
Putting symrefs into all the xml2rfc templates would not be a
bad idea.
The 'default; in the templates on the RFC Editor's webpage
(http://www.rfc-editor.org/formatting.html) are already set to give
symbolic references,
If you want to suggest a change in the default,
writing to xml2rfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is a good first move.
There is an issue with 'no surprises' as Marshall has written on that list.
/Elwyn
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf