Brian E Carpenter wrote:
"CoDoNS enables multiple namespace operators to manage the same part of
the name hierarchy [...] Ideally, competing operators would preserve a
single consistent namespace by issuing names out of a common, shared
pool. In the presence of conflicting or inconsistent records,
One doesn't need to read further to observe that this is a broken
namespace.
An alternate view is that one does not need to read further to note that this
scheme calls for coordination at the top of the naming hierarchy, just like any
other scheme needs to, in order to be viable.
Whether the coordination is performed by a central authority or a cooperative
society of participants is entirely irrelevant, to the underlying requirement of
preventing name conflicts.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf