Paul E. Jones wrote:
I wonder how customers might react to seeing new gateway hardware produced utilizing "historic" RFCs. What does that mean? The statement from the IESG is that it means you did something you ought not to have done. I believe we are now quibbling over the word "audio". What I don't understand is why you didn't have this discussion with the RAI and APP folk before the document was released and come up with a mutually agreeable alternative. A spirit of cooperation would demand no less, right? Eliot |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf