pet request (was Re: draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Brian,
I will look into it.
I would like to come back on my pet issue.
I would like we apply the usual netiquette when we refer to a draft and we post it as:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt
I beg your support as a Chair to establish that practice.

Is there someone who thinks this would not save time to everyone and help the authors to get more comments?
jfc


At 10:31 08/08/2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

I'd like to ask for comment on draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt.

The reason it was written in this particular form is that the IETF
has never really set down its procedures for how extensions to
IETF protocols should be handled, if they originate outside the
IETF. It's a practical problem that comes up quite frequently.

The draft intentionally doesn't talk about technical design aspects
of extensions - there is another draft on that topic in the works.

    Brian


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]