On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 06:48:28AM -0700, todd glassey wrote: > So Thomas - Is this a NOT SO SUBTLE form of harassment?. Well, given that Thomas posts the "Weekly posting summary" for the IETF list every week, you can't make the claim that this was personally directed at you. You only have you to blame that you are personally responsible for over one-quarter of the IETF list traffic. That being said, we have received complaints that your posts besides being voluminous, are off-topic and/or have not been adding much if any value to the discussion. May I suggest that you try to stop and think about whether the messages you send are true, necessary, and kind, and whether waiting 24 hours before pressing the send button and perhaps doing an editing pass to combine e-mail messages and combine them to create a higher signal-to-noise ratio, might cause you to be perceived as better member of this community? One of your friendly Sergeants-At-Arms, - Ted > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Thomas Narten" <narten@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: <ietf@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:56 AM > Subject: Weekly posting summary for ietf@xxxxxxxx > > > > Total of 122 messages in the last 7 days. > > > > script run at: Fri Jul 28 00:03:02 EDT 2006 > > > > Messages | Bytes | Who > > --------+------+--------+----------+------------------------ > > 26.23% | 32 | 26.08% | 250016 | tglassey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > 10.66% | 13 | 10.48% | 100481 | john-ietf@xxxxxxx > > 7.38% | 9 | 5.77% | 55362 | touch@xxxxxxx > > 6.56% | 8 | 5.44% | 52194 | brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > 0.82% | 1 | 9.63% | 92362 | alh-ietf@xxxxxxxx > > 5.74% | 7 | 4.05% | 38848 | dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > 3.28% | 4 | 5.26% | 50443 | jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf