Nelson, David wrote: >> By way of providing some incentive, I suggest that Proposed >> have a limit, such as 3 or 5 years (and, yes, we can quibble >> about that, too.) If the work cannot gain sufficient adoption >> by the end of that time, it has failed and warrants moving to >> Historic. > > I think that may be too harsh, if there has been some adoption in the > market but less than "sufficient" adoption (however we define that). > Perhaps moving to Informational would be more appropriate, in those > cases. excellent point and reasonable suggestion. that provides another point to quibble about. (quibbling is not a bad thing. merely secondary to whether the community really wants to make a decision.) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf