Hi Bob, > *> > > *> >>And I'd be reasonably happy if we specified 'any version of rsync greater > *> >>than X.Y.Z', or some such. The current debian stable version (2.6.4-6) > *> >>would work for me. > *> > > *> > Saying "rsync version 2.6 or later" works for me, as long as we > *> > understand the "can't eat our own dogfood" aspect of this requirement. > *> > > A contractual requirement at this level of detail seems totally > crazy. So how would you specify the requirement to provide rsync functionality in the SOW? Henrik _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf