As a formal Standards Process - what is the records retention process - and what are the defined records that make up the Evidence Package from any given initiative? This is a serious question for any and all efforts within the IETF. The other issue is the authentication and guarantee that the Mail List Hostroy's are accurate and that the Mail Server's were not messed with to impact any individuals participation in the list profess are today essentially non-existant and are required in most all proofing models currently accepted. Todd Glassey -----Original Message----- >From: Richard Shockey <richard@xxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Jul 18, 2006 11:45 AM >To: 'Melinda Shore' <mshore@xxxxxxxxx>, 'Dave Cridland' <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >Cc: 'IETF-Discussion' <ietf@xxxxxxxx> >Subject: RE: Meetings in other regions > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Melinda Shore [mailto:mshore@xxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:31 AM >> To: Dave Cridland >> Cc: IETF-Discussion >> Subject: Re: Meetings in other regions >> >> On 7/17/06 11:26 AM, "Dave Cridland" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > I think Melinda's intention was to suggest that the meetings ought to >> > be growing in significance. >> > Is that better? >> >> The wording is better, but it's still the case that I'd rather that >> we made a better effort to conduct the bulk of the IETF's business on >> mailing lists rather than in meetings. What I'm saying is that it's >> hard to get the toothpaste back in the tube, and that if the growing >> role of meetings is inevitable let's acknowledge that and try to make >> it work well. >> >> I like Spencer's suggestion. In the past I've prepared final meeting >> minutes by editing together the minute-taker's notes and the jabber >> log and I thought it worked very well. >> > > >I've found that to be a very useful technique a well. The other thing that >continually amazes me is that more WG's have not adopted the practice of >appointing a WG Secretary to assist the chairs in various administrative >functions like document tracking, NIT reviews and more importantly being the >defacto permanent scribe. > >I'm constantly amazed at WG meetings where 5 or 10 minutes being wasted >trying to console some poor soul into acting as a scribe. > > >I cant imagine co-chairing the ENUM WG anymore without a WG Secretary. I >wholeheartedly recommend enough the practice. > > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ietf mailing list >Ietf@xxxxxxxx >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf