Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 20:52 17/07/2006, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Refusing to address such issues could be interpreted as some
kind of evidence by the claimant.  Better they try it even if
they get it wrong - after all this is IMO about an "attempt to
enforce netiquette" on two mailing lists,

Correct. Not the purpose of RFC 3683.

not a "human rights" question for the UN.

Correct. But RFC 3935 + the IESG response is.
jfc



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]