Re: RFC Editor SOW Review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:08:59 -0400
Cc: IAB <iab@xxxxxxxx>, IETF Discussion <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, techspec@xxxxxxxx, IAOC <iaoc@xxxxxxxx>, The IESG <iesg@xxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <44B657C4.60102@xxxxxxxxx> (Stewart Bryant's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:25:08 +0100")
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

I do not support Stewart's comment.

However I will note that our current process requires the rfc-editor
to accept ASCII input along with non-normative PDF or PostScript
input.  The SOW should reflect this current practice.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

References:
- RFC Editor SOW Review
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
  - From: Stewart Bryant

Prev by Date: Room Rates RE: Meetings in other regions
Next by Date: RE: RFC Editor SOW Review
Previous by thread: Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
Next by thread: Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]