Re: netwrk stuff

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12-Jul-06, at 19:28 , Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

I can't believe that I just raised my hand after "who is willing to work on this tomorrow"... But here is the abstract, let me know if I should write the rest:

RFCs are published as Informational, Proposed Standard or Experimental. This represents the confidence level the IETF/IESG has at the moment of publication. Irrespective of I/PS/E, a document may move to Standard (which replaces Draft Standard and Internet Standard) or Historic if its implementation and deployment warrant this. The IESG publishes a short note explaining the rationale when changing designations.


I also like this basic proposal.
I feel there is good value in indicating to people which documents have clearly succeeded, which have clearly failed, and which documents are still indeterminate (= the jury is still out). I have been asked by employers to prepare documents describing this for various protocols in the past.

- Philip


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]