Bad IPv6 connectivity to commercial networks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
traceroute6 to www.isc.org (2001:4f8:0:2::d) from 2001:510:102:100:20a:95ff:fecd:987a, 30 hops max, 12 byte packets
1  2001:510:102:100:206:d6ff:fe0f:b806  2.201 ms  7.626 ms  1.444 ms
2  2001:410:101:13::1  1.846 ms  1.736 ms  3.85 ms
3  2001:410:101:5::1  24.331 ms  24.983 ms  102.792 ms
4  2001:410:101:30::2  239.214 ms  96.351 ms  96.318 ms
5  2001:320:1b00:1::1  210.57 ms  210.528 ms  210.714 ms
6  2001:320:1a05::10  211.26 ms  220.1 ms  210.472 ms
7  2001:320:1a05::20  211.47 ms  254.317 ms  211.431 ms
8  2001:320:1a09::1  214.655 ms  214.478 ms  214.43 ms
9  2001:320:1a07::2  216.013 ms  216.143 ms  215.784 ms
....

FWIW, I complained about this issue (lack of commercial peering/transit, e.g., NTT or GBLX or their customers) to RISQ and Canarie (v6 upstreams) on Saturday, but have seen no response or improvement.

Routing to Europe or the US through various networks in Japan leaves room to improvement..

(Connectivity to academic networks is excellent, though..)

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]