RE: Last Call: 'Proposed Experiment: Normative Format in Addition to ASCII Text' to Experimental RFC (draft-ash-alt-formats)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Monday, June 19, 2006 10:05:30 AM +0200 Yaakov Stein <yaakov_s@xxxxxxx> wrote:

And that's one of the reasons why volunteers maintain xml2rfc (both
the format itself and various implementations).

And here is precisely where we are expending efforts.
I too enjoy coding, but why are we recreating for the XML2RFC
environment
mechanisms that exist in available tools?

"We" aren't expending any effort. The IETF has not spent any resources on defining the xml2rfc grammar or implementing tools that operate on it. We haven't formed a working group, spent any meeting time, or done anything to suggest that people are required to use it.

A few volunteers developed a language and some tools, not in an effort to define a standard source format, but because they wanted to make life easier for themselves as document authors. They were kind enough to share their tools with the community, and other people started using them, and contributing to their maintenance and development. I find those tools to be quite useful, as do many other people. Please stop suggesting that these people are somehow wasting "our" time with their efforts.

-- Jeffrey T. Hutzelman (N3NHS) <jhutz+@xxxxxxx>
  Sr. Research Systems Programmer
  School of Computer Science - Research Computing Facility
  Carnegie Mellon University - Pittsburgh, PA


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]