With respect to the specific document that led to this discussion, draft-ietf-ltru-matching, I have asked the WG members at http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ltru/current/msg04975.html as follws: If anybody who has contributed would like their name to be mentioned, or thinks that somebody else's name is missing, please don't hesitate to say so, or to contact the editors or chairs directly. I am not aware of any such requests up to now, but maybe my co-chair or the editors have received some. Just for completeness, and because this is due to a Last Call comment brought up on this mailing list, I would like to extend the above request to this list: If you think that you should be listed in the Acknowledgements section of draft-ietf-ltru-matching, please contact the editors or the chairs of the LTRU WG. Regards, Martin. At 17:02 06/06/07, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: >On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:58:15AM +0200, > JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote > a message of 13 lines which said: > >> - Appendix A - some names seem to be missing. I could quote a small >> score of them? > >I do not know if there are written rules about the "Acknowledgements" >or "Credits" section in a RFC. It seems quite variable between the >RFCs. I am mentioned in draft-ietf-ltru-matching-14 for what I regard >as a very small contribution and not in RFC 4408 where I feel that my >contribution is more substantive. > >Anyway, these appendices are not normative and are only useful for >historical reasons and to brush the ego :-) > > > >_______________________________________________ >Ietf mailing list >Ietf@xxxxxxxx >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf