At 10:02 07/06/2006, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:58:15AM +0200,
JFC (Jefsey) Morfin <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
> - Appendix A - some names seem to be missing. I could quote a small
> score of them?
I do not know if there are written rules about the "Acknowledgements"
or "Credits" section in a RFC. It seems quite variable between the
RFCs. I am mentioned in draft-ietf-ltru-matching-14 for what I regard
as a very small contribution and not in RFC 4408 where I feel that my
contribution is more substantive.
Dear Stephane,
This may seem trivial, but IMHO quoting every contributor is
important for several key reasons.
- the IETF is made of paid and free volunteers. The reward of the
free participants is their exposure. If we want top quality
participants we must acknowledge their contributions.
- every contribution can be a key stone in the final construct. That
people like Michael Everson, Ned Freed, Lee Gillam, John C. Klensin,
Felix Sasaki, Michel Suignard, and Tex Texin are not quotted seems
odd. Others like Scott Hollenbeck and Sam Hartman really helped. What
about Karen Broome, M.T. Carrasco Benitez, N. Piercei? Inputs or help
from Brian Carpenter, Ted Hardie, Dylan N. Pierce are real.
- the IPR is to all the co-authors. Every person having contributed a
word, a concept, a change, positively or negatively is a co-author.
This also has some importance to show the document is not the work of
an affinity group (as discussed in RFC 3774) but of a true WG.
- I consider BCP 47 went from an initial error to a technical split
of the International US Internet from the Multilingual Global
Network. We now need to insure interroperability between them two
(for example MGN will accept "en-EU", IANA not). Afrer the PR-action,
this calls for many experts to accept this is a true IETF proposition.
jfc
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf