> From: Eliot Lear [mailto:lear@xxxxxxxxx] > > Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > > That overlooks the fact that often the protocol is written up after > > the experiment, the results of which are described elsewhere. > > > > The main ongoing experiments are of the form: 'I believe that the > > protocol approach described in this document to address real > > deployment needs better than the WG consensus. > > I agree this happens. I don't think these are experiments > and I don't think they should be labeled as such. Fine if you want to support the creation of an alternative label that provides a better description. If the idea is to attempt to further centralize control then it would be unwise. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf