Re: 'monotonic increasing'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 In your previous mail you wrote:

   A "Dictionary of mathematics" offers both definitions, first
   what you found f(x) > f(y) for x > y.   Followed by the other
   definition f(x) >= f(y), where the first case would be called
   "strictly monotone".  I vaguely recall that "strict" (in the
   German version), it's not completely unusual.
   
=> in French we have the same thing: "monotone" is either
f(x) >= f(y) or f(x) <= f(y) for x > y and "strictement monotone"
is either f(x) > f(y) or f(x) < f(y) for x > y.

Regards

Francis.Dupont@xxxxxxxxxx

PS: the preliminary agenda for the next IETF is supposed to be published
today but is not yet on the IETF meeting page?

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]