Re: Document Action: 'US Secure Hash Algorithms (SHA and HMAC-SHA)' to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And *as* one of the authors of the proposed-RFC in question, I find the
statement even more curious. Given the objections, I was proposing
different text that would have aligned the statement with text already
found in other RFCs already published.

	Tony Hansen
	tony@xxxxxxx

Sam Hartman wrote:
>>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>     Brian> Tony, That would have amounted to the author and IESG
>     Brian> deciding to change the IETF's policy on derivative works,
>     Brian> which would have been way out of line, especially in view
>     Brian> of the ongoing debate about this point in the ipr WG.
> 
> Had this sentence been added by the author it would not have changed
> anything about IETF policy.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]