Re: Call for input: draft-hartman-mailinglist-experiment-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Hartman writes:

> I'm interested in feedback on the following issues:
>
> * Is 18 months too long for the experiment.  I don't think so but have
> received one comment requesting 12 months.
>
> * Are there limits that need to be placed on the IESG's authority?  My
>   preference is to grant the same authority available under RFC
> 2418 for WG lists to all IETF lists.
>
> * Are there other changes that need to be made?

You forgot this:

* Are there better ways for list members to spend their time in
service of the IETF than by coming up with new ways to censor and ban
on mailing lists?

Perhaps some simplification is in order; I believe an Act of Congress
might be a good model to follow in looking for something less complex
than the current policy.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]