Re: IAB Response to Appeal from [...]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote:

> I hope this list will soon be a IANA managed mailing list,
> or that the IESG requires the WG-ltru to gives it a more
> precise status through RFC 3066 bis (a debate I proposed
> and I was denied).

That's of course not the case, it was debated for quite some
time in "the making of 30066bis":

<http://mid.gmane.org/42B0A3A6.7694@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<http://mid.gmane.org/42B32C25.1466@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Just two examples grepping for "3934" in an LTRU archive.
 
> I consider that Harald and I are both only trying to do our
> best to clarify a complex issue to the benefit of the users
> and of the IETF. I genuinely hope the IAB decision will help
> us to openly discuss it, taking the necessary time.

Whatever it takes.  I like a new IAB draft published recently:
<http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-iab-idn-nextsteps-02>
-- 
Frank



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]