Re: draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 26, 2006, at 9:46, nick.staff@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Also I figure anyone banned by an experimental process is going to make a lot of noise in the appeals process and we might start to annoy our counterparts who have to hear them?

Isn't the (seemingly) requisite appeal following any action of this sort just part of the experiment? And if we just use mock bans as you suggest, then of course they should be followed up with mock appeals, which the IESG or IAB pretend to listen to and make decisions about. We could even pretend to have endless discussions without conclusions on various mailing lists.

These are just my thoughts and I'm not tied to any of them so you risk no argument by disagreeing.

These aren't even my thoughts. :-)

Ken

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]