grenville armitage writes: > Must admit I always thought it was constructive speech (in the sense > of attempting to engineer solutions, new architectures, protocols or > clarity of understanding) that was at the core of discussions at IETF. Then I suppose that threads such as "Meeting Survey Results," which have nothing to do with these goals, are out of order? Decisions as to what counts as "constructive" are subjective, unfortunately. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf