A different question:
Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
Some additional comments on closer reading and a general comment:
This registry intentionally (if you look at the RPID document) is not
meant to directly extend the RPID schema. I suppose that one could add
that any location types added automatically become XML elements in the
urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid namespace. I don't know if that's
appropriate.
Doesn't this make it hard/impossible to check if an RPID
document is schema-valid? (I mean keeping some element
names in a list that's not a schema.)
Perhaps that's not important for this application though.
Stephen.
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf