Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx> writes:

    Andrew> On Jan 17, 2006, at 5:57 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:

    >> I have only had a brief look at this document but I'd like to
    >> second some of the concerns raised so far.
    >> 
    >> 1) If locations can be registered on a fcfs basis we can expect
    >> receivers to see locations that they are unfamiliar with.  As
    >> such, we need to do better about internationalization for
    >> locations.  It is not good enough to treat locations as
    >> identifiers that are not displayed to a user if receivers are
    >> often going to run into locations.

    Andrew> Not that I fully understand your concern, but would you
    Andrew> want expert review of new additions?


So, I'me a receiver.  I receieve a location that I'm unfamiliar with.
How do I render it in my native locale?

I'm not sure expert review would help with this.


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]