Re: Alternative formats for IDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Jan 13, 2006, at 12:07 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:

What is important is not the files used to tailor the production service, but the prevalence of expertise and tools for that service.

In reality, nroff expertise is isolated in a tiny community. In reality, xml expertise has become global. That's not an assessment of hypothetical, future adoption. It is an assessment of *existing* adoption.

Agreed.

Adopting an XML structure for the creation of RFCs and related documents should be moving in the right direction. At some point, even removing nroff as a crutch may ensure greater conformity for tools used to process documents. Although nroff is an extremely powerful and efficient word processing application, building upon more versatile and hierarchical structures offers many possibilities for managing the growing complexity of information being amassed.

Both approaches requires post processing together with the cut and paste of some templates. As long as xml2rfc allows a means to bypass formatting difficulties in getting a good looking draft, regardless whether this requires 120 characters or 12, the end results in text form of either process _can_ be identical. Cut and paste does not take much effort either way, and even the clumsiness for some operations in xml2rfc can be readily overcome. XML data structures enable new features with less effort, like automatic generation of bibliographies or the insertion of hyperlinks in html output versions. XML also has the ability to add new elements to accommodate new features without disrupting other forms of output.

-Doug


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]