In message <A9062431F4994D02CD846987@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeffrey Hutzelman writes: > > >It seems like the more efficient approach would be to essentially have two >stages, where the authors first sign off on the result of copy-editing, and >then on whatever cosmetic changes are needed after the final conversion. > That assumes that the xml->nroff conversion is always error-free. I think that that's an overassumption. --Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf