Re: Alternative formats for IDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Randy.Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Brian E Carpenter wrote:


...

What we are seeing is increasing use of fully automated tools that don't
have humans identifying which octets are MIB and which are code.  You can't
do that with plain ASCII.

You can do that with meta-data encoded in plain ASCII. In fact, that
would work better for automated extraction than anything visual such as
using multiple fonts.

<code>...</code>


Does the RFC editor accept HTML in plain ASCII RFCs?

They accept ASCII. <code> looks like ASCII to me.
Actually <html> looks like ASCII too :-)

Seriously. If we want to embed metatdata tags in RFCs, we can just do it.

   Brian

   Brian


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]